Rule the hedge budget a ceiling, not a quota#467
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The hedge budget is a ceiling, not a quota. This ruling closes a drift the warmth sweep itself introduced: treating "at most one full-strength no-guarantee statement per chapter" as a target meant a cover-to-cover reader would still meet the general charter fifteen or more times, while revised Part I promises the opposite ("stated plainly once so it does not have to trail after every chapter").
The distinction now enforced: a boundary that teaches its own chapter's subject (the census sentence for classifiers, the doorstep for reception, the /ɸ/ certification joke for sound mysticism) is content and stays. A restatement of the general charter in local clothing is the trailing, and Part I's single statement carries it alone.
Changes
documents/reference/voice_for_models.md: the waiver row now states the ceiling-not-quota reading, that a chapter whose subject does not raise the temptation carries none, and that the general charter lives once, in Part I.Examined and kept
The other merged keepers were re-read against the stricter line and all hold as chapter-specific content: Part I's charter statement (the one home), the sound-practice opening (fitted to the thesua example above it), the doorstep, the ripple-effects community-evidence statement, the /ɸ/ certification close, and chapter 11's census cluster. Chapter 10's "Phi prescribes the order, not the speed or state of mind anyone brings to it" (in open #466) also stays: SOV-mindfulness is the manual's single strongest temptation, which is exactly what the placement rule asks.
Audit
Full protocol run. The diff is two deletions and one table-cell revision; the counting pass reports every hard-zero row at zero and no new prose patterns. Validator: 1275 entries, 0 errors, 0 warnings.