Measure theory 1.2.23: add translation invariance to Lebesgue_measure.unique#537
Merged
teorth merged 1 commit intoJun 22, 2026
Conversation
Exercise 1.2.23 assumes a translation-invariant measure; without it, weighted measures on the unit cube satisfy the other hypotheses but are not Lebesgue measure. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes narinluangrath's report on #517.
Bug
Lebesgue_measure.uniqueonly assumed empty-set zero, nonnegativity, countable additivity on Lebesgue measurable sets, and unit-cube normalization. That does not characterize Lebesgue measure.Root cause
The standard uniqueness proof subdivides the unit cube into congruent boxes; that step needs translation invariance, which was missing from the hypotheses.
Why this fix is correct
Any density-weighted measure
m(E) = ∫_E fwithf ≥ 0,∫_{[0,1]^d} f = 1, and non-constantfsatisfies the old hypotheses but is not Lebesgue measure. Addingm (E + {x}) = m Ematches Tao's Exercise 1.2.23 and the Jordan-measure uniqueness statements earlier in the project.Test plan
lake build Analysis.MeasureTheory.Section_1_2_2Made with Cursor