Skip to content

completed design-1#2678

Open
yashhh-23 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
yashhh-23:master
Open

completed design-1#2678
yashhh-23 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
yashhh-23:master

Conversation

@yashhh-23
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 5, 2026 18:18
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Adds Java implementations for two LeetCode data-structure problems (Design HashSet and Design MinStack) and fixes a README formatting issue.

Changes:

  • Added MyHashSet implementation using 2D boolean bucketing.
  • Added MinStack implementation using two stacks to track minimum values.
  • Updated README markdown for “Problem 2” header formatting.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File Description
design_hashset.java New MyHashSet implementation with bucket/position hashing.
MinStack.java New MinStack implementation with min-tracking stack.
README.md Fixes markdown header formatting for Problem 2.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread design_hashset.java
Comment on lines +14 to +26
public MyHashSet() {
this.buckets = 1000;
this.bucketItems = 1001;
this.storage = new boolean[buckets][];
}

private int hash(int key) {
return key % buckets;
}

private int pos(int key) {
return key / buckets;
}
Comment thread design_hashset.java
Comment on lines +15 to +16
this.buckets = 1000;
this.bucketItems = 1001;
Comment thread MinStack.java
Comment on lines +8 to +12
import java.util.Stack;
class MinStack
{
private Stack<Integer> stack;
private Stack<Integer> minStack;
Comment thread MinStack.java
Comment on lines +32 to +46
public void pop()
{
stack.pop();
minStack.pop();
}

public int top()
{
return stack.peek();
}

public int getMin()
{
return minStack.peek();
}
@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Implement Hash Set (MinStack.java)

  1. Wrong Problem: The submitted solution addresses the MinStack problem, not the HashSet implementation problem. Please ensure you submit code for the correct problem.

  2. Missing HashSet Implementation: The HashSet problem requires implementing a custom hash set with add, contains, and remove methods using a hash table approach (the reference solution uses a double hashing technique with primary and secondary buckets).

  3. Code Quality (for MinStack): If MinStack was the intended problem, the solution is well-structured with clear comments explaining the approach of using two stacks. The time complexity is O(1) for all operations as required. The space complexity is O(n) which is optimal.

  4. Next Steps: Please implement the MyHashSet class with the required methods (add, contains, remove) as specified in the problem description.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Implement Min Stack (README.md)

The student has not submitted any code for the MinStack problem. To receive credit, the student needs to:

  1. Implement the MinStack class with all required methods (push, pop, top, getMin)
  2. Ensure O(1) time complexity for all operations
  3. Submit actual Java code (or their chosen language) that compiles and works correctly

The reference solution demonstrates a correct approach using two stacks - one for the main stack and one to track minimum values. This is a standard and efficient solution that achieves O(1) time for all operations.

Since no code was provided, I cannot evaluate correctness, time/space complexity, code quality, or efficiency. The student should review the problem requirements and submit a working implementation.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants