🔒 Fix SSRF vulnerability in RestClient host configuration#48
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
aabf3a3 to
13c44f6
Compare
1e8d399 to
aa20f53
Compare
|



🎯 What: Validates the
opts.hostconfiguration provided to theRestClientusing the built-inURLclass."${string}"union type allowed for any arbitrary string to be passed into the API calls, potentially allowing a malicious user/configuration to cause an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) by interacting with unintended internal resources or external sites through the SDK's host argument.🛡️ Solution: The change introduces a
try/catchblock that parses the host throughnew URL(opts.host). It will now throw anErrorand block the execution if the given host does not evaluate to a valid URL structure. Tests were also added ensuring correct functionality.PR created automatically by Jules for task 3027409861171783670 started by @rustyy