Skip to content

add flow-over-heated-plate/fluid-openfoam-basicReactingMultiphaseClou…#834

Draft
mike-tree-corvid wants to merge 2 commits into
precice:developfrom
mike-tree-corvid:flow-over-heated-plate-lagrangian-particles
Draft

add flow-over-heated-plate/fluid-openfoam-basicReactingMultiphaseClou…#834
mike-tree-corvid wants to merge 2 commits into
precice:developfrom
mike-tree-corvid:flow-over-heated-plate-lagrangian-particles

Conversation

@mike-tree-corvid

Copy link
Copy Markdown

add flow-over-heated-plate/fluid-openfoam-basicReactingMultiphaseCloud tutorial case to show verification of implicit coupling of Lagrangian particles

TODO: Summarize and motivate the changes, link to issues, remove the checklist entries that are not relevant.

Checklist

  • I added a summary of any user-facing changes (compared to the last release) in the changelog-entries/<PRnumber>.md.

For new tutorials or tutorial cases:

…d tutorial case to show verification of implicit coupling of Lagrangian particles
@mike-tree-corvid

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

corresponds with precice/openfoam-adatper pull request here:

precice/openfoam-adapter#405

@precice-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This pull request has been mentioned on preCICE Forum on Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://precice.discourse.group/t/does-openfoam-adapter-support-lagrangian-particle-checkpointing/2947/11

@MakisH

MakisH commented Jun 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for contributing the tutorial as well! I have not yet looked closer, but the problem setup is different than the current flow-over-heated-plate tutorial, right? In that case, the convention would be to make a separate tutorial directory (e.g., flow-over-heated-plate-particles or similar, whatever describes it best) and describe the case in the respective README.md.

@mike-tree-corvid

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for contributing the tutorial as well! I have not yet looked closer, but the problem setup is different than the current flow-over-heated-plate tutorial, right? In that case, the convention would be to make a separate tutorial directory (e.g., flow-over-heated-plate-particles or similar, whatever describes it best) and describe the case in the respective README.md.

The problem setup is the exact same as the flow-over-heated-plate tutorial with the exception that the necessary files / settings are such that 100 Lagrangian parcels / particles (1 particle per parcel) are injected at time = 0 and are left to propagate through the domain. The intent was to give the particles the same properties as the fluid so that they simply follow the flow rather than affect it, thus making any changes in the solution potential flags for something being wrong with the Lagrangian particle implicit coupling implementation.

I debated whether to slide this contribution under the flow-over-heated-plate tutorial, or make it a stand alone tutorial. I'm happy to do either. Do you want to wait to decide what should be done until you take a closer look, or are you pretty decided that it should be a separate tutorial and I should go ahead and make the change?

@MakisH

MakisH commented Jun 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I will take a closer look to this tutorial, the adapter PR, and the related discussion in ~a week.

For comparison, we have:

as separate tutorials.

…o" instead of explicit lib for patch injection
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants