docs: complete jedit retained evidence release gate batch

[flyingrobots]

Summary

• document Slice 6 retained receipt posture on Echo app-facing intent outcomes
• document jedit Slice 7-10 progress through structural-history intent material, generated package install, round-trip evidence, and release-gate report
• mark the current Echo/jedit retained-evidence release-gate batch complete in docs/WorkItems.md

Companion jedit PR: flyingrobots/jedit#30

Validation

• git diff origin/main...HEAD --check
• pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/WorkItems.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-next-ten-slices.md
• cargo xtask lint-dead-refs --file docs/WorkItems.md --file docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-next-ten-slices.md
• pre-push: cargo test -p warp-core --lib coordinator::tests

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@flyingrobots, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 9 minutes and 10 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3bcef7c1-9a18-4b4f-9386-83f3b49f7193

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21a36b7 and db57c37.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• crates/warp-core/src/coordinator.rs
• docs/WorkItems.md
• docs/design/product-facing-intent-outcome-api.md
• docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-next-ten-slices.md
• docs/method/backlog/v0.1.0/PLATFORM_product-facing-intent-outcome-api.md

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch stack/retained-evidence-release-gate-next

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[flyingrobots]

@codex Activity Summary

Issue	Severity	Source	File	Commit	Outcome
No unresolved review threads found	N/A	PR review thread scan	N/A	N/A	No code/doc changes required in Echo during this audit pass.
Self-audit of Echo diff	N/A	Self-audit	crates/warp-core/src/coordinator.rs, docs touched by PR	N/A	No new blocking issue found. Retained receipt posture remains generic and noun-free; docs match the completed 10/10 companion jedit batch.

Validation after audit:

• git diff origin/main...HEAD --check passed.
• pnpm exec markdownlint-cli2 docs/WorkItems.md docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-next-ten-slices.md passed.
• cargo xtask lint-dead-refs --file docs/WorkItems.md --file docs/design/v0.1.0-jedit-next-ten-slices.md passed.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Summary

• Reviewed the trigger, PR metadata, and PR comments: the audit explicitly states no unresolved threads and no required code/doc updates, so I made no repository changes in this follow-up pass.
• I also did not create a commit and did not call make_pr, because there were no new changes to commit.

Testing / Checks

• ✅ git status --short
• ✅ git log -n 5 --oneline

Notes

• Working tree was already dirty before any action in this turn (pnpm-lock.yaml was modified), and I left it untouched per the “no changes required” trigger outcome.

View task →