Skip to content

feat(board): add support for Soldered NULA Dual ESP32C5#12602

Open
franFodor wants to merge 2 commits into
espressif:masterfrom
franFodor:soldered-nula-esp32c5
Open

feat(board): add support for Soldered NULA Dual ESP32C5#12602
franFodor wants to merge 2 commits into
espressif:masterfrom
franFodor:soldered-nula-esp32c5

Conversation

@franFodor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

By completing this PR sufficiently, you help us to review this Pull Request quicker and also help improve the quality of Release Notes

Checklist

  1. Please provide specific title of the PR describing the change, including the component name (eg. „Update of Documentation link on Readme.md“)
  2. Please provide related links (eg. Issue which will be closed by this Pull Request)
  3. Please update relevant Documentation if applicable
  4. Please check Contributing guide
  5. Please confirm option to "Allow edits and access to secrets by maintainers" when opening a Pull Request

This entire section above can be deleted if all items are checked.


Description of Change

Add a board variant for the new Soldered NULA Dual ESP32C5 board by Soldered Electronics

  • Add board configuration to boards.txt
  • Add pin definitions to 'variants/soldered_nula_dual_esp32c5'

Test Scenarios

The Board variant was tested using the mentioned Soldered NULA Dual ESP32C5 board running on the arduino esp32 core ver. 3.3.8 using Arduino IDE ver. 2.3.8
The tests included trying all pin functionalities, UART, SPI and I2C (Qwiic) communication. PSRAM was tested using the functions ESP.getPsramSize() and ESP.getFreePsram()

Related links

As the board is not yet released, I'm providing pinout and an image of the board.
Nula Dual ESP32-C5 Schematic.pdf
DSC01049

@franFodor franFodor requested a review from P-R-O-C-H-Y as a code owner May 19, 2026 10:20
@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLAassistant commented May 19, 2026

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 19, 2026

Warnings
⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:

  • the commit message "add suggested changes":
    • summary looks empty
    • type/action looks empty

Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips:

  • follow Conventional Commits style
  • correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue
  • allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test
  • sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 10 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter
  • avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers)

TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

👋 Hello franFodor, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against e0fc1d9

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y added the Type: 3rd party Boards Related to third-party/non-Espressif hardware boards. label May 21, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@franFodor PTAL on my comments.

Comment thread boards.txt Outdated
Comment thread boards.txt Outdated
@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y added the Status: Awaiting Response Awaiting a response from the author label May 21, 2026
@franFodor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@P-R-O-C-H-Y Hello, thank you for the suggestions and I have made the changes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y added Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged and removed Status: Awaiting Response Awaiting a response from the author labels May 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged Type: 3rd party Boards Related to third-party/non-Espressif hardware boards.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants