Teach the design-intent-verb rule, then warm Part III under it#465
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two commits, in the order the work was ruled to happen: the voice guide learns the design-intent-verb rule first, then Part III's warmth revision follows the updated guide.
Voice guide update
documents/reference/voice_for_models.mdgains the rule that governed the Part I and Part II restorations but lived only in PR bodies until now:Part III warmth revision
Four of the eleven files change; eight lines. The register work, under the hedge budget and the new rule:
Seven files are untouched: the vowel, consonant, and IPA reference pages are clean reference register, and the stress, transfers, and exercises files already end well ("one stray glide is an event, not a diagnosis").
Judgment calls to review
Audit
The full voice_for_models.md protocol ran in order, including the row-by-row counting pass on the diff. Named findings, corrected before commit: the chapter 7 introduction's old ending carried the exact "speaker's work" possessive tail the Part II pass had just flagged, and converting it removed a corpus-level stamp; the vista draft initially reused "instrument" from Part I's laboratory close and was reworded; the pearl sentence was recast to avoid placing an American spelling beside this file's existing British "neighbours." Counting results: all hard-zero rows at zero, one earned triple (the promise's literal content), one aphorism-class image per document, waiver count now one full-strength in chapter 7 and zero in chapter 8, whose remaining "cannot" sentences are grammar facts. Validator: 1275 entries, 0 errors, 0 warnings.