-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
fix(EC-1994): correct off-by-one in validate image worker loop #3425
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
cuipinghuo
wants to merge
1
commit into
conforma:main
Choose a base branch
from
cuipinghuo:EC-1994
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+7
−7
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was some left-over incorrect documentation, right??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it was stale/incorrect documentation. It was introduced in 5302c52 (
fix(ec-1404)) — that commit rewrote this README line to say "This parameter is currently not used. All policy evaluations are run with 35 workers." The "35" likely came fromconforma.workerCount: 35which is set in ~107ReleasePlanAdmissionCRDs inkonflux-release-data. However, thatworkerCountfield is never wired to the task'sWORKERSparam — the release pipelines inrelease-service-catalogdon't pass aWORKERSparam at all, so the task YAML default always controlled--workers. The README was wrong from the moment it was written.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correction to my previous comment: my local clone of
release-service-catalogwas stale. The upstreamkonflux-ci/release-service-catalogdoes passWORKERSin the managed pipelines (underpipelines/managed/), e.g. https://github.com/konflux-ci/release-service-catalog/blob/main/pipelines/managed/rh-advisories/rh-advisories.yaml — the value comes from$(tasks.collect-task-params.results.extractedValues[0]), which extractsconforma.workerCount: 35fromkonflux-release-data.So for release pipelines, the task default doesn't matter — it gets overridden to 35 (which with the old
<=bug meant 36 actual goroutines). The task default only applies when the task is invoked without an explicitWORKERSparam (e.g. integration pipelines viaverify-conforma-konflux-ta).The README text "This parameter is currently not used" was still misleading though — the parameter is used, it's just that the release pipelines override it.