Skip to content

feat: audit cross-provider place conflicts - #143

Open
atomantic wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
cos/sys-a5765c61-feature-ideas-msa7a2gn/agent-a34e3f0c
Open

feat: audit cross-provider place conflicts#143
atomantic wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
cos/sys-a5765c61-feature-ideas-msa7a2gn/agent-a34e3f0c

Conversation

@atomantic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Automated PR created by PortOS Chief of Staff.

Summary

Improved the existing tree auditor to surface real cross-provider vital-place conflicts without creating alias or detail-loss noise.

Changes

  • Added a shared cross-source mismatch matcher, used by both date and new place audit checks.
  • Enabled normalized place mismatch auditing by default and added unit coverage for conflicts and false-positive guards.
  • Updated the roadmap and unreleased changelog; committed as c55df0b.
  • Validation passed: focused Vitest suite (26 tests), full production build, and git diff --check.
  • Assumption: the assigned worktree is SparseTree (no data/COS-GOALS.md exists), so its GOALS.md, DONE.md, and PLAN.md supplied the feature-review evidence.

@atomantic

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Review loop blocked before merge.

  • Codex (gpt-5.6-terra): completed three rounds; two substantive cache-path defects were fixed and the final pass returned no further findings.
  • Ollama (pinned hf.co/empero-ai/Qwythos-9B-Claude-Mythos-5-1M-GGUF:BF16): both allowed attempts failed with curl: (52) Empty reply from server; the local reviewer endpoint returned no .findings verdict.

Validation after the fixes: npm run test:unit (116 passing) and npm run build (shared, server, and client) passed. The PR is intentionally left open because the required Ollama review was a hard error, not a clean/capped verdict.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant