Add named multi-connection support for MSF and Sliver#238
Merged
whotwagner merged 11 commits intoJun 9, 2026
Merged
Conversation
whotwagner
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Task
#175
also fixes #190
Description
Extend msf_config and sliver_config to support multiple named connections (matching existing bettercap_config/remote_config pattern).
Each command accepts an optional connection field; if not specified first configured connection is used.
Backwards compatibility: Single-connection configs (old format) are automatically migrated to a named
defaultentry with Pydantic field_validator(mode='before'), --> existing playbooks and configs require no changes.Changes:
How Has This Been Tested?
manual test with two attacker and one target (Metasploitable2)
playbook:
Output:
Checklist