`# trufflehog:ignore` not honored for Postgres URLs without an explicit port

[mrstanwell]

TruffleHog Version

• 3.95.3

Trace Output

https://gist.github.com/mrstanwell/dbd00c7ae2996dedcf8a83aca6d06b16

Expected Behavior

# trufflehog:ignore on a line containing a Postgres URL suppresses the finding regardless of whether the URL includes an explicit port number.

Actual Behavior

When a Postgres URL omits the port (e.g. postgresql://user:pass@host/db), # trufflehog:ignore does not suppress the finding. Adding an explicit :5432 to the same URL makes the annotation work correctly.

Steps to Reproduce

# Case 1: no explicit port — trufflehog:ignore is NOT honored (exit 183)
printf 'DB=postgresql://user:secret@host/db  # trufflehog:ignore\n' > /tmp/config.env
trufflehog filesystem /tmp/config.env --fail
echo "exit: $?"

# Case 2: explicit port — trufflehog:ignore IS honored (exit 0)
printf 'DB=postgresql://user:secret@host:5432/db  # trufflehog:ignore\n' > /tmp/config.env
trufflehog filesystem /tmp/config.env --fail
echo "exit: $?"

Workaround

Add a port number to the postgres URL and the # trufflehog:ignore directive will be honored.

Environment

• OS: macOS 15.7.3

Additional Context

I notice that the output shows Raw result: postgresql://user:secret@host:5432, even when there was no actual port number in the URL in the file. That is not, in fact, a "raw" result; and I suspect it is causing a !found result in FragmentLineOffset, thus pre-empting the check for the ignore tag. (I considered submitting a fix, but I don't know why the URL is being normalized with the port number included, or what the implications would be of not doing that...)