Skip to content

Internal references #58

@mtomasini

Description

@mtomasini

Is there any reason why most of our links are full URLs instead of relative paths? E.g. at line 9 of ./content/_index.md, we link to the Statement of Purpose of SIG SSLA by linking to https://sslarch.github.io/about/ instead of linking simply to ./about/ (which works, I checked).

The reason I raise this is that, for example, I just moved one of our pages under /documents/ to its own page, and of course that would break the whole link once the document is out - while relative links would tend to be more stable.

We are not doing so much linking that this is going to kill the website, I was wondering if there is any good reason for this.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions