Skip to content

Audit external brand references #3161

Description

@somewherelostt

Summary

This issue audits remaining external brand references in the codebase.

I found 154 tracked occurrences across two reference groups:

Reference group Occurrences Main areas
Group A 119 landing package scopes/imports, package lockfile, CLI installer, marketplace copy, comments
Group B 35 design docs, renderer styles, UI comments, e2e comments

These may be historical, intentional, or carried over during earlier implementation work. Opening this for visibility so we can decide what should stay documented and what should be cleaned up.

Supporting context

Current git history points to these commits touching the relevant lines:

Area Related contributors Commits
Group A @codebanditssss, @Annieeeee11, @JAYATIAHUJA, @ashish921998 5a587191e8c3, fff06624ab41, 2b069aec440c, 00aa98b1534e, d60c49f5fb19
Group B @yyovil, @Annieeeee11 c2c4404c7d59, e493de6ad72b, 662405cdc887

Request

Could the tagged contributors please help confirm whether these references are still intentional?

If they are intentional, it would be helpful to document the reason near the relevant code or docs.

If they are no longer needed, we should clean them up so the codebase consistently reflects our own brand.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions